> Does anyone else feel queasy about all the info: URIs in SRW?
A little, but other related web protocols (OpenURL and OAI) have adopted
them. It's not like we're inventing our own URI scheme. We could also
have said that the identifiers were strings in a particular form.
There's also nothing to say that anyone has to use info URIs if they don't
That said, we should link the various documentation about info URIs from
the web page. As it stands, it -does- look like these are 'SRW info URIs'
as opposed to info URIs which have the srw namespace.
,'/:. Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::. Nebmedes: http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I