It would be good if someone asked them why or how they perceive SRW to
be synchronous. It isn't clear to me whether this assessment is
relative to Z39.50, which does define an asynchronous mode, concurrent
operations. And for SRW, we had that discussion and decided not to.
Could that be what they're talking about?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Sanderson" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 11:53 AM
Subject: Re: FW: More on SQI
> > I did send them pointers to SRW (their original draft didn't even
> > mention SRW), and I believe Ralph contacted them too - as a result
> > down as a contributor to the spec!
> I wrote a nice comment inviting them to come and discuss things.
> if they do.
> ,'/:. Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
> ,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
> ,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension
> ,'---/::::::::::. Nebmedes: http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
> I L L U M I N A T I