I've been using XMLSpy to validate the schemas plus trying them in the
Axis and .Net SOAP toolkits!
It does appear that this is a problem with the schema though. I switched
from xsd:sequence to xsd:all to accommodate a request from Ralph for a
base request and response types. Using all, I'd hoped to avoid having to
change any implied order to the parameters listed in the specification
document (see Ralph's e-mail of the 23 Jan "Based Message Type", and
mine of the 26 Jan "Re: Review of 1.1"). I did ask at the time "I've
changed this to xsd:all i.e. order is no longer important - this may
break things (I've checked that Axis can cope), so comments/reactions
please!!" but got no reactions or comments (or at least didn't spot
any!)
XMLSpy and the other tools I was using seemed happy with this approach,
but it appears this is wrong see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/2002Oct/0156.html
Sorry, Ray, I'll have to post another update to the schema.
Matthew
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Marc Cromme
> Sent: 17 March 2004 15:02
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: SRW schema validation ??
>
> Hi folks -
> I am working on an SRW server implementation in PHP4 I have
> great troubles trying to validate my own 'explainResponses'
> against the SRW schema
>
> http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/zing/srw/srw-types.xsd
>
> My srw:explainResponse starts out something like this;
>
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <srw:explainResponse
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
> xmlns:srw="http://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/"
> xmlns:diag="http://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/diagnostic/"
> xmlns:xcql="http://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/xcql/"
> xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/
> http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/zing/srw/srw-types.xsd">
> <srw:version>1.1</srw:version>
> <srw:record>
>
>
> I tried quite a few xml-schema validators, and they complain
> about the scheme as such.
>
> Now what ??
>
> Which tools do you use to make sure that the xml output from
> your reference implementations are correct in schemas ???
>
> Some hints to good tools to use?
>
> Or some hints where the error in the scheme might be ??
>
>
> DETAILS:
>
> XMLLINT: seems to be a bug in xmmlint, gives very confusiong errors
>
>
> PPARSE (Xerces)
>
> PParse -n -s -f tmp/explain.sru.tmp
>
> Error at file http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/zing/srw/srw-types.xsd,
> line 26, char 41
> Message: An 'all' model group that's part of a complex type
> definition must constitute the entire content type of the definition
>
> Error at file http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/zing/srw/srw-types.xsd,
> line 43, char 42
> Message: An 'all' model group that's part of a complex type
> definition must constitute the entire content type of the definition
>
> Error at file http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/zing/srw/srw-types.xsd,
> line 58, char 41
> Message: An 'all' model group that's part of a complex type
> definition must constitute the entire content type of the definition
>
> Error at file http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/zing/srw/srw-types.xsd,
> line 70, char 42
> Message: An 'all' model group that's part of a complex type
> definition must constitute the entire content type of the definition
>
> Error at file http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/zing/srw/srw-types.xsd,
> line 81, char 41
> Message: An 'all' model group that's part of a complex type
> definition must constitute the entire content type of the definition
>
> Error at file http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/zing/srw/srw-types.xsd,
> line 91, char 42
> Message: An 'all' model group that's part of a complex type
> definition must constitute the entire content type of the definition
> tmp/explain.sru.tmp: 1395 ms (73 elems, 55 attrs, 18 spaces,
> 874 chars)
>
>
>
> GOTDOTNET
> http://apps.gotdotnet.com/xmltools/xsdvalidator/Default.aspx
>
> (only trying to validate the schema as such)
>
>
> Cannot resolve schemaLocation attribute. An error occurred at
> , (7, 4).
> Cannot resolve schemaLocation attribute. An error occurred at
> , (8, 4).
> 'all' is not the only particle in a group or being used as an
> extension.
> An error occurred at , (10, 6). 'all' is not the only
> particle in a group or being used as an extension. An error
> occurred at , (17, 6).
> 'all' is not the only particle in a group or being used as an
> extension.
> An error occurred at , (71, 10). The derived type and the
> base type must have the same content type. An error occurred
> at , (68, 4). 'all' is not the only particle in a group or
> being used as an extension. An error occurred at , (17, 6).
> 'all' is not the only particle in a group or being used as an
> extension. An error occurred at , (92, 10). The derived type
> and the base type must have the same content type. An error
> occurred at , (89, 4). 'all' is not the only particle in a
> group or being used as an extension. An error occurred at ,
> (10, 6). 'all' is not the only particle in a group or being
> used as an extension. An error occurred at , (27, 10). The
> derived type and the base type must have the same content
> type. An error occurred at , (24, 4). 'all' is not the only
> particle in a group or being used as an extension. An error
> occurred at , (17, 6). 'all' is not the only particle in a
> group or being used as an extension. An error occurred at ,
> (44, 10). The derived type and the base type must have the
> same content type. An error occurred at , (41, 4). 'all' is
> not the only particle in a group or being used as an
> extension. An error occurred at , (10, 6). 'all' is not the
> only particle in a group or being used as an extension. An
> error occurred at , (59, 10). The derived type and the base
> type must have the same content type. An error occurred at ,
> (56, 4). Type 'http://www.loc.gov/zing/cql/xcql/:operandType'
> is not declared. An error occurred at , (145, 12). Type
> 'http://www.loc.gov/zing/cql/xcql/:searchClauseType' is not
> declared. An error occurred at , (209, 12). The
> 'http://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/diagnostic/:diagnostic' element
> is not declared. An error occurred at , (136, 8).
>
>
|
