Thanks it is clearer now. I'm sorry that I missed the SRU request. I
suggest that you shade it as you have the SRW request.
From: Robert Sanderson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 11 March 2004 12:24
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Scan Term Extension
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Mike Taylor wrote:
> > From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
> > I don't understand this. The extension only applies to response and
> > the response data in SRU is identical to SRW?
> That request parameter must begin with "X-", like all extension
> parameters (right, Rob? You didn't say this in your document), and
Right. I will add that.
> it, but I think this is a cryptic way of saying "Cheshire version 3.0,
> Requested Term extension" ... at first, I thought it was line noise
:) the third character is an o for org
> As it happens, there's only one element in this namespace,
> "markRequestedTerm", so putting it all together, the SRU request
> parameter needs to be
Yup. Will fix my SRU example. Thanks ;)
,'/:. Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::. Nebmedes: http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I