LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for EDUCAT Archives


EDUCAT Archives

EDUCAT Archives


EDUCAT@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EDUCAT Home

EDUCAT Home

EDUCAT  April 2004

EDUCAT April 2004

Subject:

Re: EDUCAT discussion list

From:

"Anita S. Coleman" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Discussion List for issues related to cataloging & metadata education & training <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 27 Apr 2004 08:55:51 -0700

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (66 lines)

The question:

> > What should be the core competency of all LIS students in the area of
> > cataloging and metadata?

The response from Anaclare Evans:

> > > My goal is for my students to be someplace between level II and
> > > level III after completing the class.  The state of Michigan has a
> > > number of digital projects underway and is going to need a number of
> > > individuals who can participate in the planning and execution of
> > > these projects.

I agree - the more competent and higher LIS students can place the better.
The dilemma for us at Arizona has been one of implementation: 1) how many
courses will or should it take to reach level 3 and 2) since most of our
students will probably not take "information organization" beyond the
minimum required how much can be comfortably fitted into 1 standard (3
credit unit) graduate course?  What does that competency really look like?
In the report that Ingrid shared, am I right in assuming that it looks
like 3-4 courses would be sufficient to develop Level 3 expertise?

That's sort of what we've aimed for at University of Arizona.  We have a
required core in Organization of Information.  This is an introductory
course and is thus the first also in an electives track of 15 courses in
"Knowledge Organization" (Cataloging & Metadata Management, Controlled
Vocabularies, Theory of Classification).  DC and other metadata standards
are integrated from the start. There are some things in the intro course
that have helped motivated students (who may never take another cataloging
course) reach the higher level of competency. On the other hand, it does
appear to be information overload to students who are very new to LIS.

I use the Taylor Organization of Information as course text and supplement
it with exercises that are completed by students at one of two levels:
required and optional.  Students also use my Knowledge Structures Toolbox
(KS Toolbox which lists a bunch of metadata standards and other things
that are available via the WWW. Understanding and practice with certain
tools and standards is required and thus students must complete
assignments and final projects that are focused on digital resources and
DC or another specialized standard of their choice (EAD has been most
popular next to DC). Basic exercises in reading MARC, simple AACR
cataloging,authority control, creating concept maps, crosswalks, etc. are
all introduced at time of text reading but provided as optional exercises.
Students complete them at will. This may sound backwards but, with further
streamlining I am optimistic it may indeed continue to work well.

One problem that I see with this approach is that it seems to be geared to
highly motivated students (who've also had some exposure/work experience
in libraries or other information environments).  It doesn't appear to do
much to entice newcomers into the field and I need to work on this aspect.

I have had students who have only taken the 1 course above and been hired
as Digital Librarian (for cataloging) or Metadata Librarian/Coordinator.
In fact one of them commented that if she'd known she'd have paid better
attention to all exercises since everything covered is of value now on the
job.  This sort of anecdotal evidence has been encouragement to continue
the approach.

If anybody is interested I'll be happy to provide urls for syllabi, the
toolbox and class projects students have completed.  Let me know. Thanks.

Anita Coleman
Asst. Prof. SIRLS
Univesity of Arizona
Tucson

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
July 2020
June 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
March 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
June 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
December 2007
November 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
April 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager