What's the result of this? Is everyone happy and can I put a link to
it in the extensions page?
(Or let me rephrase: is anyone unhappy?)
--Ray
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Sanderson" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: Scan Term Extension
> > (Rob's example has
> > c3o_rt-mark_RequestedTerm
> > which I think is wrong for two reasons: the missing "X-" prefix
and
> > the extraneous underscore.)
>
> Fixed. Also moved it to a better location:
> http://srw.cheshire3.org/extensions/requestedTerm.html
>
> Now, here's a question:
>
> If parameter names are case sensitive (which I believe that they are
as
> XML is case sensitive), then X-foo and x-foo are different
parameters.
> Should we be more explicit in the documenation at
> http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/zing/srw/extra-data.html
> that the x must be lower case?
>
> Rob
>
> --
> ,'/:. Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
> ,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
> ,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension
3142
> ,'---/::::::::::. Nebmedes: http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
> ____/:::::::::::::.
> I L L U M I N A T I
|