> Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 18:49:58 +0200
> From: Janifer Gatenby <[log in to unmask]>
>
> You've lost me. I don't want to re-invent authenticationToken, I
> want to use Rob's. The SRU examples use Rob's definition therefore
> they need to be consistent.
I beg your pardon, then, I was on a different page completely. Yes,
of course all references to any given extension should be the same! I
misunderstood your plea for "consistency" as meaning that all SRU
extension parameters corresponding to info URI-based SRW extension
elements should have names structured in the same way. My mistake.
_/|_ _______________________________________________________________
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ "By filing this bug report you have challenged the honor of
my family. PREPARE TO DIE!" -- Klingon Programming Mantra
--
Listen to free demos of soundtrack music for film, TV and radio
http://www.pipedreaming.org.uk/soundtrack/
|