What would the addInfo be? The rejected term? Some sort of hint as to
where the masking character would be legal?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 11:10 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: diagnostic examples
> From: "Robert Sanderson"
> > We don't have a diagnostic for 'Masking character in unsupported
> > eg, a server that can handle foo* but not *foo or f*oo
> Anyone object to adding this?