> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 2:38 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: diagnostic examples
> > What would the addInfo be? The rejected term? Some sort of hint as to
> > where the masking character would be legal?
> As I look at the existing addinfos, it almost seems that they are intended
> to be machine proceessible. Was that our intent? I hope not. I would think
> for this one it would be some human readable explanation of the server's
> masking limitation.
I do think it is intended to be machine readable. In this case, I think the
best we can do is to show the rejected term.