On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote:
> I just took a look and Rob has already defined "score" in his metadata set,
> I suggest that we agree on a normalization range, say 0-1 as suggested, and
> modify the definition as such.
Yup, certainly.
> (I don't think there's a need to be able to specify different
> normalizations, and that just makes the metadata more complex -- e.g.
Ditto.
> We still need a way to request the metadata.
> For example, we could define: info:srw/extension/1/record-metadata
Or /2/ ;)
This is what I had in mind, but wanted feedback on the context set first
before going into the extension stuff.
> the above though, only if we establish an association between this
> extension id and Rob's metadata set.
Right. But I think that's how it has to be, for namespace reasons.
If you ask for a different schema, you'll get back a different namespaced
element, and we don't want that, right?
Rob
--
,'/:. Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::. University of Liverpool
____/:::::::::::::.
I L L U M I N A T I L5R Shop: http://www.cardsnotwords.com/
|