> This was discussed at the meeting in DC with regard to getting rid of
> XCQL -- that anything which could be expressed in xcql could
> be done with
> a string encoded term.
Yes, I regret missing that meeting - the point of XCQL wasn't that it
could do anything more/better than CQL but that you could use your
existing XML parser for parsing it rather than have to write another
(text) parser. Heck, we could do all of SRW as a string encoded term for