ZNG June 2004
Re: CQL binary terms (was Scan)
"Matthew J. Dovey" <[log in to unmask]>
Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative
Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:51:10 +0100
> OK, sounds good to me. Is it just the obvious two-chars-per-byte
> thing where "foo" is encoded as "666f6f"?
Yep, so a 4-fold increase in size if using UTF-16 (as each of the two
chars is two bytes).
Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink
Subscribe or Unsubscribe