> Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:26:03 +0100
> From: "Matthew J. Dovey" <[log in to unmask]>
> > Basically we do/will ignore the returned message text in the live
> > situation. Of course we have a user profile which tells us
> > directly what language they want.
> Which was one of the arguments against putting the message element
> in (we didn't have such in SRW 1.0).
Right. But this is another Dumb Client thing, right? Among the
assumptions that Dumb Clients make is that their users are English (or
at least can read English error messages!)
I completely agree that Real Clients should feel free to ignore the
message in favour of interpreting the diagnostic code and addinfo in a
way that's appropriate for their users.
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ "I think it should either be unrestricted garnishing, or a
single Olympic standard mayonaisse" -- Monty Python.
Listen to free demos of soundtrack music for film, TV and radio