I think the schemas are supposed to prevent any nilled parameter -i.e.
optional ones should be omitted not nilled. Although quite a lot of the
toolkits don't seem to acknowledge the difference.
Matthew
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Robert Sanderson
> Sent: 13 July 2004 12:42
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Nilled parameters
>
> While we have a 'do not nill mandatory params' rule, it's
> still acceptable to send nilled optional parameters.
>
> But what should we do with these in the echoedQuery part of
> the response?
> Return <recordSchema/> or just omit them?
>
> Rob
>
>
> ,'/:. Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
> ,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
> ,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
> ,'---/::::::::::. University of Liverpool
> ____/:::::::::::::.
> I L L U M I N A T I L5R Shop: http://www.cardsnotwords.com/
>
|