> I suppose I should just join the SRW mailing list if I do
> much more of
> this :-)
Please do - only one other person (apart from myself) tested the current
draft schema after I made the (somewhat major) change from all groups to
sequence groups - and he reported that the schema was fine - as did the
testing tools I was using (which included a WS-I Compliance testing
tool). I was just about to get Ray to update the live schemas and was
writing up the changes when I spotted the duplication problem and hence
have delayed sending Ray the new ones until I can do a more thorough
review in case there was something else wrong.
Having some others on the list to validate the schema using other tools
would be very usefull!