> So, you think it would be better to present the users with alternateTitle,
> uniformTitle, spineTitle, runningTitle, subTitle indexes?  Or better yet,
> 100$o, 110$o, 130$a, 240$a, 242$a, 245$a, 245$b, 245$c, 245$h, 245$n,
245$p
> and so on for the 51 fields that I index as "title".

No, No! I'm not arguing against a simplified representation for complex
searching, I'm arguing against placing that burden on dc. If there is a
general title index, and you map it to a dozen fields, and you also map dc
to the exact same fields, that's up to you. Someone else may map the two
differently.
--Ray