LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for EDUCAT Archives


EDUCAT Archives

EDUCAT Archives


EDUCAT@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EDUCAT Home

EDUCAT Home

EDUCAT  September 2004

EDUCAT September 2004

Subject:

Re: Call for participation: Technical Services Ed. SIG

From:

Janet Hill <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Discussion List for issues related to cataloging & metadata education & training <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 15 Sep 2004 10:10:16 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (80 lines)

-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion List for issues related to cataloging & metadata education
& training [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Hope A. Olson

I find this discussion quite interesting because of what seem like different
underlying assumptions about what should be in the graduate curriculum (and,
of course, all of us putting in two cents on behalf of our schools). Are we
assuming that the actual skills of hands-on cataloging should be central or
the conceptual foundations of organizing information or both?

JSH: I'm speaking from the perspective of an employer, and a long-time
observer. I truly believe that EVERY individual who receives a masters
degree from an accredited program should have at least some
introduction/exposure to hands on cataloging.

1) Just as one never really learns how a piece of software works until one
uses it, one never really understands how it is that the mechanisms of
cataloging work to create bibliographic control until one has "used" them by
creating a record or two, and seeing how the product would "play out" in a
catalog. And even people who will never catalog need to know "how it
works".

2) It is very easy for someone who has never had to try to translate the
reality of a book/map/video/website into a cataloging record that fits into
a catalog to assume that the work is simple-minded, simple, rote,
not-worthy-of professionals. Such a mistaken view of the work can lead
those in other departments, and management to make disastrous decisions
regarding personnel allocation and prioritization. (I once offered to
contribute some of my cataloging staff to Special Collections, if they would
also contribute some of their staff time to begin cataloging the vast
majority of their collection what was completely inaccessible through the
catalog. (my department was not responsible for their cataloging, theirs
was, but over time they removed their cataloger from cataloging and put her
on the desk). The answer was .... No, that would be hard. We can do
without cataloging. Talk about a shortsighted decision! It sprang from a
lack of respect and understanding for what cataloging can accomplish)

3) It is very difficult for someone who has had no exposure to cataloging
prior to coming into an MLIS program to have any sense at all of what the
work is like, whereas it is very easy for them to envision what reference
work might be like. And so, it is easy for them to reject cataloging
(after all, there are many around them who are willing to tell them how dull
it is) without trying it. If they just got a little taste of it, they might
be drawn to it by the satisfaction of bringing (partial) order to chaos, of
solving puzzles and getting paid for it, of dealing with BOTH the forest and
the trees.

4) Libraries only succeed through cooperation/collaboration within them, and
cooperation/collaboration among them. The more we can all understand about
the work of each other, the more effective our collaborations will be.

I appreciate the fact that cataloging/bibliographic control has gotten more
complicated over time, and that it is crucial to convey principles and
establish context, and that doing so takes more time than it used to. So
it's easy for me to see how the old "Introduction to Cataloging" courses
have transmogrified into "Introduction to the Organization of Information".
But because it HAS gotten more complicated, it seems to me that it is at
least as critical as it ever has been to make sure that EVERY prospective
librarian has to contemplate the principles, and ALSO has to see, through at
least a little practice, how those principles translate into action and
effect.

Bibliographic control/organization of information is the gift that
librarianship brings to the world of knowledge. It is the sine qua non of
our profession. How can we send new professionals out into the world
without making sure that they have more a solid foundation in it that
includes both principles and basic application?

Stepping off my soapbox now ....

   janet

Janet Swan Hill
Professor
Associate Director for Technical Services
University of Colorado Libraries
CB184
Boulder, CO 80309
[log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
March 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
June 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
December 2007
November 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
April 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager