LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for EDUCAT Archives


EDUCAT Archives

EDUCAT Archives


EDUCAT@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EDUCAT Home

EDUCAT Home

EDUCAT  September 2004

EDUCAT September 2004

Subject:

Re: Web Clearinghouse for Metadata Materials

From:

Heidi Hoerman <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:05:29 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (38 lines)

I second the thanks to Anita and all those involved with this effort!

I have two points to address:  one ethical and one pragmatic

THE ETHICAL ONE:

My questions have more to do with ethical questions than with organization of the site itself.  Part of this arises from concerns about self-preservation and part from watching the recent kefluffle on JESSE about using the teaching materials of another.

We all make our livings based, to a greater or lesser extent, on our abilities to create and use good teaching materials.  Some of use also publish versions of those materials as textbooks.  Sharing teaching tools is nothing new. Lord knows, some of the assignments I use now arose from assignments Monina Abrera let me copy to use when I was a mere wet-behind-the-ears adjunct!  We all want to share but we also don't want to give away the farm.

Like many instances of information sharing, ramping up to this level of information sharing requires us to determine a set of ethical guidelines that go beyond the legalities. This might prevent the kind of ever-so-slightly-rabid discussion the recent JESSE instance represents.

I suggest we draft a short statement of what is or is not ethical use of this material.  For example, many of us must place information representing evaluation of our teaching in our review files.  Certainly use of our teaching materials by a colleague at another institution represents affirmation of our performance in this area.  What about a simple ethical statement like "It is expected that those who use materials linked to this website, either verbatim or as a model for their own materials, will notify the original author of the materials."  A simple email would do the trick.   Those who needed more for their files could ask the user of the information for something on letterhead or whatever.

Another guideline may expect that we cite our sources for teaching materials of this type just as we cite the sources of quotes we use from the published literature.

I'm not trying to be "Use Police" here.  I just think that we do need to think of ourselves while we work toward the greater good.  If we don't protect ourselves and our intellectual output we risk being replaced by inferior copies of ourselves by those who would overuse us.

THE PRAGMATIC ONE

Can the documents for which the creator has no access to a public server be stored on the same server as the clearinghouse itself?  One problem with that, of course, is that people tend to forget they send stuff to an off-site place and the stuff never gets updated.  (I have enough trouble remembering to delete and remove links to stuff that's too old for words on my own site to worry about stuff I've sent someone else.)

Gratefully to all working on this,
Heidi
(who still is planning to send examples of using chat for AACR2!)





HEIDI LEE HOERMAN
SCHOOL OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, COLUMBIA, SC 29205
PHONE: (803) 777-0485, (800) 277-2035 FAX: (803) 777-7938
EMAIL: [log in to unmask] (preferred)
           [log in to unmask] (second choice)
URL: http://www.libsci.sc.edu/hoerman/basepage.htm

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
March 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
June 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
December 2007
November 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
April 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager