Michael Everson wrote:
> Very nice. Very political.
Meaning what exactly?
That we should consider it?
That we should not consider it?
And why not?
Please expand - four word responses tell the JAC very little.
> At 13:23 +0200 2004-09-28, Håvard Hjulstad wrote:
>>This message, with the attached file, may be of interest for the JAC in
>>connection with a possible re-visit to the question of Latgalian.