Some more specific comments:

1) The Rec context set's indexes do not include 'record'.  Hence
rec.identifier, not rec.recordIdentifier.

There's no need to include a referent type as all indexes in the context
set are explicitly defined as being the record, not a resource the record
may describe.
(Much like dc isn't dc.resourceIdentifier)

2) If the profile needs 'word', surely it needs 'string' ?  Or will there
    only ever be keyword queries? (That seems ... unlikely?)

3) I cannot begin to fathom the difference between uncontrolledTerm and
    subjectTermsUncontrolled, but if the GILS community can that's okay :)

4)  dc.productLinkage has some busted html. Also... uhhh...
       dc.productLinkage?

5)  rec.localNumber  -- This would never occur as the type is Identifier,
     not Number.

6)  Your example includes rec.lastModified, but:
     a)  it doesn't exist any more, should be lastModificationDate
     b)  it's not in your profile as being supported :)
         (modificationDate <> lastModificationDate)

Rob


       ,'/:.          Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
     ,'-/::::.        http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
   ,'--/::(@)::.      Dept. of Computer Science, Room 805
,'---/::::::::::.    University of Liverpool
____/:::::::::::::.  L5R Shop: http://www.cardsnotwords.com/
I L L U M I N A T I