LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ZNG Archives


ZNG Archives

ZNG Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ZNG Home

ZNG Home

ZNG  December 2004

ZNG December 2004

Subject:

Adlib Base profile

From:

Hedzer Westra <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative

Date:

Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:12:40 +0100

Content-Type:

multipart/mixed

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (36 lines) , AdlibBaseProfile.txt (1 lines)

Hello all,

attached is the preliminary version of the Adlib Base Profile. It is
meant as a starting point for profiles that
Adlib customers create; it defines the software side of things.
Customers can configure the SRU server with the schemas and context sets
they want to use and therefor must extend this base profile.

The intention is that customers write their own profile but also provide
the Adlib Base Profile (or at least refer to it). So, people writing or
using SRU clients should be able to read and understand the Adlib Base
Profile without having any Adlib knowledge.

On some points it differs from what the CQL context set defines, these
differences are (clearly?) pointed out.

I'd appreciate it if you could take some time to read it and check if I
didn't do or write anything stupid...
Also, I'n not a native speaker, nor is our technical writer, so if made
some errors in my English you can correct me if you want to..

Many thanks in advance for your time!

Best regards,

Hedzer Westra, Systems Developer

Adlib | Information Systems
Reactorweg 291
3542 AD Utrecht
Postbus 1436
3600 BK Maarssen
tel: +31-30-241 1885
www: http://www.adlibsoft.com



The Adlib Base Profile version 1.0 and The Adlib Context Set version 1.0 Monday December 13th, 2004 Hedzer Westra, [log in to unmask] Adlib Information Systems http://www.adlibsoft.com Contents Introduction URIs SRW, SRU and CQL Requirements Optional and server-dependent features Configuration Implemented SRW/CQL features Unimplemented optional features Adlib server-specific implementations Indexes Relations Terms Modifiers Sorting The Adlib Context set ------------- Introduction This document describes the Adlib Base Profile 1.0 of the SRU server that is implemented by Adlib Information Systems in its Internet Server software. It is only a partial profile; it only describes the software capabilities. For each installation and configuration of this software a full profile document should be defined. URIs The URI for the Adlib Base Profile is "http://www.adlibsoft.com/srw/1.0/". The Adlib context set is identified by the URI "http://www.adlibsoft.com/cql/1.0/". The preferred identifier for this URI is 'adlib'. These are not URLs; do not expect an HTTP response on these locations. They are only meant for identification purposes of Adlib's implementation of the SRU protocol. SRW, SRU and CQL The SRW and SRU protocols, and the CQL language, CQL context set and SRW Base Profile are all described on http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/zing/index.html. Please refer there for information about this search protocol. Requirements The Adlib Internet Server implements all features required by the SRW Base Profile, refer to http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/zing/srw/base-profile.html. Optional and server-dependent features SRW/U and CQL are quite broad protocols which allow for many optional and server-dependent features. This document defines which optional and server-dependent features are implemented, and how these function. Configuration Adlib supplies a number of applications to its customers, who can make changes and additions to their applications. Therefore there is no single 'Adlib' context set or profile. Each customer can configure their Internet Server to produce the SRU context set and profile that is required. For any such configuration a context set and profile document should be created. This document describes the Adlib Base Profile and the Adlib Context Set, which form the basis of such a document. Therefore, only meta-indexes are defined here. Metadata formats (like Dublin Core or MarcXML) are not defined here. Implemented SRW/CQL features - protocol version 1.1 - the SRU protocol, i.e., HTTP GET/POST CGI requests - explain operation - searchRetrieve operation - CQL 1.1 parsing - CQL 1.1 handling as far as the Base Profile requests it - CQL context set as far as the Base Profile requests it, plus some extras: + and, or, not booleans + =, >, <, <=, >=, <> relations + exact, all, any, scr relations + encloses, within relations + cql.anywhere meta-index + cql.serverChoice surrogate index - sorting - surrogate & non-surrogate diagnostics generation - recordSchemas - request echoing, xSortKeys and XCQL Unimplemented optional features - recordXPath handling - result sets - proximity searches, i.e. the 'prox' boolean operator - handling of relation, proximity & boolean modifiers - word anchoring (^) - matching on a single character using '?' - scan operation - SRW (SOAP) as communication layer Adlib server-specific implementations Indexes - The meta-index cql.anywhere searches all indexes defined in the Adlib database at once. It does not search all indexes in all context sets, as the CQL context set suggests. This might be a slow search if there are a lot of indexes. - The adlib.record meta-index searches the whole record. The operator doesn't matter. This is a slow search since no index can be used. Relations - cql.scr is always handled as '=' - The Adlib thesaurus operators 'adlib.generic', 'adlib.broader', 'adlib.narrower', 'adlib.related', 'adlib.topterm' and 'adlib.parents' do thesaurus-enabled searches. These only work correctly on indexes with thesaurus links defined. Otherwise, they fall back on '=' searching. - The 'encloses' and 'within' operators are implemented using the Adlib WHEN operator. Some examples: 'term encloses "2000 2004"' translates to 'term >= 2000 WHEN term <= 2004', and 'term within "2001 2005"' translates to 'term > 2001 WHEN term < 2005'. Two terms must always be supplied (no more, no less), separated by a single space. Terms - Searching on *...* is done using the Adlib 'contains' operator, which is slow since no index can be used. - empty term searches are not supported - * for pattern matching is only usable at the beginning and/or end of a search term Modifiers - boolean and relation modifiers are parsed but not handled. Any search with modifiers will return an error message. - there are two types of modifiers: data type modifiers and pattern modifiers. The data type modifiers are: cql.string cql.word cql.isoDate (not used) cql.number (not used) cql.uri (not used) The pattern modifiers are: cql.masked cql.unmasked (not defined in CQL context set) Of each modifier type only one can be active for each search clause. Some combinations are illegal, e.g., cql.masked and cql.number. Note that none of these modifiers can be used in search queries. They are only used here to describe default behaviour, and for future extension. - the implied cql.word/cql.string/cql.masked behaviour is different from what the CQL context set suggests. Note that the CQL context set is not required by the SRW Base Profile! It is just a suggestion how CQL searches might be interpreted. The modifiers cql.word and cql.string can not relate directly to Adlib term or word matching because this is defined per index by the user; in Adlib each index can be either word or term indexed. If required, a field can be indexed by term as well as by word. These two indexes can be be reflected using two separate CQL indexes. It is not possible to use modifiers to switch from one to the other. cql.word or cql.string semantics as described in the CQL context set are not used. For completeness, the CQL context suggests the following: when using the operator '=', the number of words in the term is counted. If it is 1, term matching should be used. If it is more than one, word adjacency matching should be used. Adlib interprets terms in the following manner: + operator 'exact': implied modifiers are cql.unmasked and either cql.word or cql.string, see =. + operator '=': implied modifiers are cql.masked and either cql.word or cql.string, depending on the index type. This cannot be seen in the explain information but must be described in a profile. + operators 'any' and 'all': implied operators are cql.word and cql.masked. The words are combined using OR (for 'any') or AND (for 'all'). + adlib.record meta-index: implied operators are cql.string and cql.unmasked. + operators 'encloses' and 'within': implied modifier is cql.masked. There is no implied data type modifier; there must be two terms separated by a single space. Implied modifier cql.unmasked means: The CQL pattern match character * has no special meaning; pattern matching is not possible using this operator. The characters ^, ? and * do not have to be escaped. Implied modifier cql.masked means: Pattern matching on * is possible. The characters ^, ? and * must be escaped with \. Implied modifier cql.word means: Words are split and then re-combined using the Adlib separators and concatenators rule. Separator characters are: [];,[email protected]()|{}<>? carriagereturn newline space tab Concatenator characters are: `-=\./~#$%^&_+:"'* Please note that the CQL context set says nothing about how words are to be split. Implied modifier cql.string means: Terms are not inspected for separators or concatenators. This implied behaviour will remain intact in future versions, even if modifiers will be supported then. The differences between the CQL context set are the following: - word adjacency is a feature that Adlib currently does not implement. - operator '=' implied modifiers is not dependent on the number of words, but on the index that is used - operator 'exact' does not imply cql.string, since cql.string or cql.word is index dependent on Adlib. - the CQL context set is not clear about the implied masking of operator 'exact'. It seems to hint at using cql.masked. However, cql.unmasked is implied in Adlib's implementation. This way, there is a clear and usable distinction between '=' and 'exact'. - operator 'encloses' seems to need only one term in the CQL context set. Adlib needs two. Sorting - sorting is only supported for hard-wired (case sensitive) paths, not for full XPaths. The customer can define a path for each CQL index. The Adlib Context set The Adlib context set version 1.0 only defines the six Adlib thesaurus operators.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

July 2017
October 2016
July 2016
August 2014
February 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
February 2013
January 2013
October 2012
August 2012
April 2012
January 2012
October 2011
May 2011
April 2011
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager