From: "Theo van Veen" <[log in to unmask]>
> I think we should not go down this route. When I want a brief record or
> a full record I do not want something that is narrower or broader than
> something for which I do not know how broad or narrow it is.
> If I am the only one for which this was an issue I would say let's
> leave it as it was.
If it would help, we could maintain information about relationships among
schemas on the maintenance agency page (it wouldn't be
machine-interpretable). I would be happy to support this activity if it
would be useful.