On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Mike Taylor wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 15:34:25 -0500
>> From: "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <[log in to unmask]>

>> For modifiers -- word and string?
> discussed more in the CQL specifications; but I don't think we should
> mandate support for the relation modifiers, as relation modifiers are

>> clause then 'cql.serverChoice' applies and the relation is scr.  So
>> we should say in the base profile that serverChoice and scr are
>> required.
> Agreed.
>> Should resultSet be required?
> Probably not.

Me too. =)

Rob

       ,'/:.          Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
     ,'-/::::.        http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
   ,'--/::(@)::.      Dept. of Computer Science, Room 805
,'---/::::::::::.    University of Liverpool
____/:::::::::::::.  L5R Shop: http://www.cardsnotwords.com/
I L L U M I N A T I