There is none because we haven't done any of this yet. But I can't see the
problem. Clearly this would be a trivial task, to set up linkages and
documentation, if we want to support this approach. --Ray
----- Original Message -----
From: "LeVan,Ralph" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: brief and full records
Because there is no linkage between the two schemas and absolutely no
indication that one is shorter than the other.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
> Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress
> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 10:50 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: brief and full records
> If I define a profile of MODS, name it ModsProfileA, call it a schema,
> assign it a URI and register it, e.g. info:srw/schema/1/modsProfileA
> is that not sufficient?
> ----- Original Message -----
> Having us assign cute names to schemas is not a technical solution to
> allowing clients to recognize that one schema is a shorter variant on
> the other.