> -----Original Message-----
> From: Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
> Mike Taylor
> Matthew J. Dovey wrote:
> > If we are going to introduce SRU POST, I think I would suggest we do
> > this (although I would anticipate SRU GET and POST being always on
> > same endpoint). It is backwards compatible with the current
> > that all of these endpoints could be the same (if you want to do
> > inspection of the incoming data to workout how to handle it), but
> > allow multiple endpoints for those who might regard having to do
> > inspection as an unexceptable overhead.
> Agree 100%. My reference to what our own implementation was meant
> to be a proof-by-existence of the feasibility of that approach -- not
> demand that everyone else implement the same approach.
Well, let me jump on this bandwagon too! I'm 110% behind it!