On Jan 25, 2005, at 9:49 AM, Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote:
> This approach, single namespace, would mean that a single
> schema would define both root elements, <mods> and <mads> (and whatever
> other root elements) and then could *include* (rather than *import*)
> xml for
> both mods and mads. I believe this would avoid the need for prefixes.
> I do think however, from a "big picture" perspective, it would
> significantly inhibit flexibility.
What kind of flexibility, for whom?