On Jan 3, 2005, at 5:26 PM, Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote:
> What I meant was, we'd need to come up with a table of which
> authority/related combinations are valid and enforce based on that.
> like that would be a nightmare (though I haven't really thought it
> and we'd probably get the table wrong anyway.
Let's see; a quick idea:
Validate authority/variant (easy with the above structure), and leave