> Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 14:40:20 -0500
> From: "LeVan,Ralph" <[log in to unmask]>
> > (e.g. Ralph would add ralph.BasicIndex to the
> > list of supported indexes).
> That just seems silly to me. What I wanted to call it was
> OCLC.ServerChoice, but that seemed pointlessly redundant and I chose to
> name the index CQL.ServerChoice. Why does the index need a life of its
> own to be the server choice?
I agree that cql.serverChoice is perfectly reasonable for this.
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ "All that I know most surely about morality and obligations,
I owe to football" -- Albert Camus.
Listen to free demos of soundtrack music for film, TV and radio