> I expect that this extension will be in the future be used quite often
> for sru clients, so lets keep the sru parameter name/value short, e.g
That would be giving this particular extension a lot of preference over
any other. While it's up to Ray to define the parameter name, there's no
reason to break with the naming scheme we already have for extensions
> restricted by the limited capabilities of static clients. I anticipate
> clients that can be adapted by the user to fit the users needs based on
> what a server may have to offer.
And the same applies here as my previous messages ... if the client can
handle it, then the client can request it.
,'/:. Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
,'--/::(@)::. Dept. of Computer Science, Room 805
,'---/::::::::::. University of Liverpool
____/:::::::::::::. L5R Shop: http://www.cardsnotwords.com/
I L L U M I N A T I