>>>> [log in to unmask] 04-01-2005 10:16 >>>
>> I expect that this extension will be in the future be used quite
often
>> for sru clients, so lets keep the sru parameter name/value short,
e.g
>> -x=ok.
>
>That would be giving this particular extension a lot of preference
over
>any other.  While it's up to Ray to define the parameter name, there's
no
>reason to break with the naming scheme we already have for extensions
>
>(x-info-<owner>-<name>)
>
>> restricted by the limited capabilities of static clients. I
anticipate
>> clients that can be adapted by the user to fit the users needs based
on
>> what a server may have to offer.
>
>And the same applies here as my previous messages ... if the client
can
>handle it, then the client can request it.
>

That is not the case for what I mean here. A user can configure a
client to handle extraData without knowing how to requerst it.

Theo