> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:21:29 -0500
> From: "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <[log in to unmask]>
>
> > Some of the new indexes you introduce are arguably applicable to a
> > broader context than GILS: for example, "audience" is a useful
> > cross-domain index that should perhaps have been included in DC.
> > Maybe we should have a CQL context set that contains such indexes?
>
> I've always advocated this and would like to start one right now.
>
> We have one candidate index: audience. Please suggest others.
>
> And a name for this: That's been the problem before, Utility and
> Cross Domain don't work because they each have alternative
> connotations. How about "useful"?

Yuck :-)

As Thomas point out, audience -- and probably many of the others that
we'd add -- are actually already there in "dcterms", which is at
        http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/index.shtml

Maybe the answer is just to make a dcterms context-set?

 _/|_    _______________________________________________________________
/o ) \/  Mike Taylor  <[log in to unmask]>  http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\  I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend
         to the death my right to slice your transparently flawed
         arguments to ribbons.

--
Listen to free demos of soundtrack music for film, TV and radio
        http://www.pipedreaming.org.uk/soundtrack/