> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:40:06 -0500
> From: "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <[log in to unmask]>
> gils.title: The name of the information resource.
> dc.title: The name given to the resource
> Leaving aside the "given to" as opposed to "of" it seems to me that
> the difference between "resource" and "information resource" is
> sufficient to merit different indexes. In the dc defintion a
> resource can be a physical object.
But the GILS definition is clearly a subset of the DC one, so a search
for resource with name X (dc.title) in a GILS database will find all
the information resources that would have been found by a search for
information resources with name X (gils.title). So dc.title seems
eminently suitable for this.
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ "You're a bright lad: we could do with someone like you to
feed the pantomime horses" -- Monty Python's Flying Circus.
Listen to free demos of soundtrack music for film, TV and radio