Oh, I think the writer I was paraphrasing wasn't suggesting a nearby
event would be deflected by a cage, rather that at a significant
distance there might be hope. They were talking a continent-wide effect
fro the larger weapons.
Wouldn't we have been better off if our best-and-brightest had been
tasked with some other great achievement?
From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mike Richter
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 3:45 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Audio storage on external hard drives
At 02:49 PM 2/23/2005 -0800, steven austin wrote:
>Short of a Faraday cage or a conductive
>mesh shielding, we kiss our electronics goodbye.
Sorry, but whether intentionally or not, that's funny. There are many
orders of magnitude between the current that would melt a conventional
and that which would flow in a nuclear event. Rebar "mesh" wouldn't
Fellows, there's enough energy involved with a near miss or an airburst
generate effects undreamed of in a mere lightning bolt. The total energy
not off a thunderstorm scale, but the power levels are extraordinary.
[log in to unmask]