On Feb 9, 2005, at 6:36 PM, Andrew E Switala wrote:
> It turns out that the type library can be modified to do exactly as
> Bruce suggests (below) without changing schema notations. If the MSTL
> schema has no targetNamespace attribute, and it is included rather than
> imported into the MODS and MADS schemata, its types and elements will
> in the namespace of the including schema.
That's good to know.
However, while it seems it might be a good idea to leave the type
library namespace-free, I still like the idea that MADS and MODS share
the same namespace. The combination of that and the namespace-free
type library give the best of all worlds it seems to me: simpler and
more flexible development, and simpler instances (processing, editing,