LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  March 2005

ARSCLIST March 2005

Subject:

Re: Identifying Acetate Tapes

From:

"Watsky, Lance" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 14:41:53 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (97 lines)

Here are two responses from my question:

1) I suspect it may have to due with how well the refractive indices of the
base materials match the coatings.  Triacetate base has a refractive index
of 1.48.  Polyester base is birefringent, with an index of about
1.64-1.66.  Gelatin emulsion has a refractive index of about 1.50, and the
binders for magnetic coatings vary.  Typically, a close match in
refractive indices would allow light to more easily pass from one material
to another.  A significant mismatch in refractive indices will have some
reflection or light scatter at the interface.

Depending on the product, the base itself may have some dye added to
reduce "light piping".

John P. Pytlak
Senior Technical Specialist
Eastman Kodak Company

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2) I discussed your question with Charlie Mayn, Chief of our NARA Dynamic Media Lab.  Here is his answer with a few comments of my own mixed in:

The "piped" light test [i.e. holding the entire tape pack up to a light source] is done looking at the edge of the base material that, generally, is at right angles to the image/sound carrying surface.  This edge-view is accomplished on rolled strands of base material looking at the side of the rolled strand pack.  The amount of light "piped" by a particular base material varies with the type of material and how it has been formulated.  

Quarter-inch audio tape is formulated such that polyester base material does not pipe much light through the strand pack and acetate base material pipes relatively a lot more.  It isn't really "opaque" and "translucent", just "very little" and "quite a bit" with a sufficient difference to make the test reliable for audio tape.

Motion picture film is formulated such that acetate does not pipe much light and polyester pipes somewhat more.  The amount of light piped varies with the particular polymer orientation in the base material, the nature of the coatings applied to the base material, etc.  Motion picture film has considerable variation in the amount of light piped among different film stocks (camera, lab, print, reversal, etc.) and light-piping characteristics are therefore not quite as reliable a test for motion picture film stocks.  The test can indicate that the film in question is likely to be acetate (little light piped) or polyester (somewhat more light piped than acetate) but is not as definitive a test as it is for magnetic recording tape.

A better test for identifying base material is using crossed-polarizing-filters which works for motion pictures as well as still picture images.  This test is done when viewing the base material [frame] from a position perpendicular to the surface of the base material that carries the image, not when viewing the edge of the base material as in the "piped" light test.  The filters test can be used to determine, with a polyester frame showing through light as blue/green color striations , but acetate/nitrate frames are clear to the light through the crossed-polarized filters.

Les Waffen
Special Media Archives Services Division
National Archives
 
Lance Watsky
Preservation & Media Specialist
The Georgia Archives
5800 Jonesboro Road
Morrow, GA 30260
678-364-3764 (phone)
678-364-3860 (fax)
[log in to unmask]
www.GeorgiaArchives.org




 



 

 




-----Original Message-----
From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Watsky, Lance
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 8:51 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Identifying Acetate Tapes


The strange part is the fact that with film  - light is more translucent with a polyester base and less so thru the acetate base. Anyone have any ideas, or guesses why? No one has been able to answer this yet!! It is a very strange phenomenon. I still think that it has to do with the tapepack, but I could be wrong.

Lance Watsky
Preservation & Media Specialist
The Georgia Archives
5800 Jonesboro Road
Morrow, GA 30260
678-364-3764 (phone)
678-364-3860 (fax)
[log in to unmask]
www.GeorgiaArchives.org




-----Original Message-----
From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Edward A. Falk
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 2:05 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Identifying Acetate Tapes


On 2005.03.01 07:25, Watsky, Lance wrote:
> I was hoping that someone can tell me if the following statement is true or incorrect:
> 
> A colleague was telling me that you can tell the difference between an audiotape that was recorded on an acetate tape, versus one that was created on a polyester base, by holding the tape up to a light source. The colleague went on to say that light will pass thru the acetate tape, whereas it will not pass thru polyester tape.  

They're right.  You can also tell the difference by pulling on it until it
breaks; the acetate snaps off cleanly while the polyester stretches first.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager