Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote:

>Nevermind the "earlierHeading" suggesting. We withdraw this part of the
>proposal.
>
>
So does that mean that what is effectively an earlier form of the
heading is coded simply as a variant without reference to having been
earlier? (This would make sense to me, just checking.)

kc

>--Ray
>
>
>

--
-----------------------------------
Karen Coyle / Digital Library Consultant
[log in to unmask] http://www.kcoyle.net
ph.: 510-540-7596
fx.: 510-848-3913
mo.: 510-435-8234
------------------------------------