>> Okay, how about:
>> 'only'
>> image.depicts image.only "feline"

> That's expressed at least as appropriately as a relation modifier
>        image.depicts =/image.only "feline"

I'm not sure that I agree with = here, it seems to abuse the weak
semantics of it.

What would 'depicts >/only canine' mean?

Rob

       ,'/:.          Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
     ,'-/::::.        http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
   ,'--/::(@)::.      Dept. of Computer Science, Room 805
,'---/::::::::::.    University of Liverpool
____/:::::::::::::.  L5R Shop: http://www.cardsnotwords.com/
I L L U M I N A T I