Daniel Leech-Wilkinson wrote:
> There's plenty of outrage on this side of the pond. The problem is finding
> anyone with the time to gather it all together and organize some serious
> lobbying. Everyone's going to be too busy issuing 1910-1954 material like
> there's no tomorrow.
> At 00:10 19/06/2005 -0400, you wrote:
> >I'm glad to hear there's some outrage somewhere. Is anyone at least
> >whether extended copyrights would apply only to new or current recordings or
> >those made after a certain date, or whether everything would now be
> >covered for
> >95 years including all those recordings now in the PD (in which case, I'd
> >better look for a new job)?