LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  June 2005

ARSCLIST June 2005

Subject:

Re: Discerning where a tape has been stored

From:

"[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:18:27 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (90 lines)

George's idea about dust is quite promising.  No tape case is entirely
air-tight and, as the micro-environment in the case heats and cools, dust is
pulled into the container.  Many areas have very distinctive soil
characteristics and an analysis of dust/dirt caught in the corners of the
case could possibly lead to a general geographic location (for example: the
red clay that is so prevalent in certain parts of the Southeast).  Of
course, once you analyze the dirt and get a general idea where the tape may
have come from, you might need to do additional work to match up soil
samples for a more precise location.

The manufacturer's codes can also be used to trace where/when the tape was
made and (possibly) where it was initially shipped for sale/distribution.
The difficulty is that the codes may say where it was made and even what
particular production batch it was from but, the codes do not distinguish
between specific tapes.  Unless all the thousands of tapes from a single
manufacturing run went to the same distributor, the codes are unlikely to
give you much more information than time of manufacture and very general
geographic (as in what continent, or what portion of a continent) the tape
was distributed in.

Another possibility is that analog tapes were frequently reused.  If you
peel the existing label off of an older tape (box), you may well find an
older label underneath with information on it concerning a previous usage.
I have seen tapes with as many as 6 or 7 different labels covering each
other up.


Peter Brothers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of George Brock-Nannestad
> Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2005 9:23 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Discerning where a tape has been stored
>
>
> From: Patent Tactics, George Brock-Nannestad
>
> Melodie Myers wrote
> > My question concerning the tapes is... can you glean specific
> information from
> > an analogue tape that has some age on it, not only an idea of
> when the tape
> > was manufactured, but where it might have been -- I've seen
> several post on
> > mold and other nastiness growing on these tapes on this
> discussion board. i.e.
> > Has someone come across something that is specific to a certain
> region and
> > would only be found with a tape stored in a particular
> environment? Say in the
> > South? I never encountered any of this in my travels with
> analogue tape, but
> > it occurred to me that many of you are not only archivist, but part time
> > research scientist and super sleuths.
>
> ----- this is really a forensic question and not one likely to be
> answerable
> by a forensic audio specialist. He or she would ask someone else in the
> department. Some kinds of dust are certainly distinguishable - the
> composition of mineral dust may indicate a more or less extensive
> stay in a
> particular location. The dust in a city is much more filled with carbon
> particles (exhaust) than dust in the countryside. Leaded gasoline
> will give a
> different kind of dust that may date the deposit (ban on lead).
> The location
> may have been somewhere in Australia or other places where asbestos of a
> particular composition is mined, or it may be a place where there
> has been a
> desert storm; the dust may be radioactive for that matter. The good thing
> about dust and dust distribution is that it will not change over time,
> whereas a biological trace may change over time. So, the best
> would have been
> if the tape had been played in a dusty atmosphere: particles
> trapped between
> tape layers. Otherwise: if the tape container has been left open for some
> time.
>
> I expect royalties if any of the above is found in your work. But then I
> expect that all these ideas have been used in C.S.I. anyway.
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
> George
>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager