LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  June 2005

ARSCLIST June 2005

Subject:

Re: Reel-to-reel tape recorder for auditioning archival tapes.

From:

Eric Jacobs <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:07:11 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (105 lines)

In the "few hundred dollar" range, I'd put the Otari MX-5050
BQII in the list of recommended machines.  Otari is one of the
last (if not the last) company still making new reel-to-reel
machines.  They may still have parts for the Otari MX-5050
BQII (worth giving them a call just to confirm).  The Otari
MX-5050 series are plentiful, so finding cheap machines for
parts should be easy if necessary.

The Otari is certainly not in the same class as the Sony APR,
Studer A807, or Revox machines already suggested by others
and which can also serve as transfer machines.  But the Otari
also costs significantly less, and can still give these more
expensive machines a good run for their money.  And since
your goal is strictly auditioning, the Otari MX-5050 BQII
should work just fine.

Note - the MX-5050 BQII (4-track) should not be confused
with the more common MX-5050 (half-track).  The MX-5050
BQII has 4 meters (and 4 reproduce amps) that display all
4 tracks simultaneously (as opposed to a quarter-track
stereo machine which only has two meters, two reproduce
amps, and displays one stereo pair at a time).  The MX-5050
BQII would not only allow you to audition, but with its
4 meters it would also allow you to easily identify format
(mono, two-track, quarter-track).  Identifying format will
help you better anticipate the transfer services you will
need down the road.

The Otari MX-5050 BQII comes up once in awhile on eBay
(maybe one every 1-2 months).  Here's an example of a
related 4-track Otari which could possibly do the job for
you and still fits your budget:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?
ViewItem&category=15199&item=7328446908&rd=1

Another great 4-track machine (comes up rarely) is the
Revox C274, but this will run you closer to $1k.  At this
price point, the Studer A807 becomes a contender.  But
the Studer A807 only has 2 reproduce amps, whereas the
C274 has 4 reproduce amps (and 4 meters).  The C274 is
a close cousin to the A807 as they share many parts in
common.

As for multiple headstacks, since you are only auditioning,
you can get by with just a quarter-track stereo configuration
(quarter-track head, two reproduce amps, two meters).
The signal will not be as strong when playing mono or
two-track tapes on the quarter-track heads, and your EQ
might be off a bit, but it will still work well enough for
auditioning.  And you just have one head configuration to
deal with.  But if you purchase a quarter-track stereo
machine, you won't be able to easily identify format.  For
format identification, you'll want a 4-track machine (4
meters, 4 reproduce amps).

In summary: for an all-in-one solution for pure auditioning
with slightly weaker audio signal with some formats, and
format identification capability with just one headstack,
consider a 1/4" four-track machine with 4 meters and 4
reproduce amps.

Any solution requiring either a custom headstack (two
playback heads on one headstack) or multiple headstacks
is going to put you well over the $500 mark.  Plus you add
the complication of switching headstacks or electrically
switching between heads - depending on how comfortable
you are with these tasks.

Eric Jacobs
The Audio Archive


---- Original message ----
>Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 06:06:53 -0700
>From: RA Friedman <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: [ARSCLIST] Reel-to-reel tape recorder for auditioning archival
tapes.
>To: [log in to unmask]
>
>A few hundred dollars has become available to purchase a ree-to-reel tape deck
so that we can audition what I believe are mostly 1/2 track and possibly 1/4
track stereo reels playing at
>3 3/4 or 7 1/2 ips. It's conceivable there are some 15 ips, but most likely
not. I'm assuming we will need two decks, one for each head configuration.
>
>Any recommendations as far as units, dealers, re-builds, etc?  We are not
planning on using the deck for transfers, but we'd like something that will
have a long useful life and won't be a huge maintenance headache.
>
>With any luck, transfers will be done by an outside specialist. We need a unit
that can give us some indication of what's on the tapes and will have minimal
impact. Luckily the tapes have been stored under cool, dry conditions and none
appears to have sticky-shed or surface/support breakdown even though some are
acetate rather than polyester.
>
>RA Friedman
>Assistant Project Archivist
>Historical Society of Pennsylvania
>
>
>---------------------------------
>Discover Yahoo!
> Stay in touch with email, IM, photo sharing & more. Check it out!

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager