LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ISOJAC Archives


ISOJAC Archives

ISOJAC Archives


ISOJAC@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ISOJAC Home

ISOJAC Home

ISOJAC  June 2005

ISOJAC June 2005

Subject:

Re: Ulster Scots in ISO 639 (fwd)

From:

"Rebecca S. Guenther" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 30 Jun 2005 15:48:07 -0400

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (104 lines)

I'm not sure where John got his information from, but Alan Danskin from
the BL says he hasn't found evidence for a code in UKMARC for this
language. That's why I brought up the harmonization-- because anything in
UKMARC that was still needed had to be in MARC 21 in some way. Here's what
he says. Is it recognized by the UK and Irish governments?

Rebecca

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:02:49 +0100
From: "Danskin, Alan" <[log in to unmask]>
To: Rebecca S. Guenther <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: RE: Ulster Scots in ISO 639 (fwd)

Rebecca,

I haven't found any evidence for a code in UKMARC.  I subscribe to the
view that this quest for recognition is politically motivated.  I'd agree
that it is a variant of Scots (it originated from Scots settlers in
Ulster) - I have heard it spoken on the radio.  However if the UK and
Irish governments have recognised it as a language and if it satisfies the
criteria in terms of documents, I don't see on what grounds the
maintenance agency could refuse a code.  It strikes me as quite similar to
the Serbian/Croatian situation.

Alan
-----Original Message-----
From: Rebecca S. Guenther [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: 28 June 2005 15:56
To: Danskin, Alan
Subject: Ulster Scots in ISO 639 (fwd)


Hi Alan:

See this discussion on the ISO 639 list. I just pulled out your request for language codes when we harmonized UKMARC with MARC 21 and Ulster Scots was definitely not on there. I can also send you further comments about John Clews request. It is questionable whether this is needed. I would assume that if it was in UKMARC you decided that we didn't need it any more?

Rebecca

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:20:11 +0100
From: John Clews <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Ulster Scots in ISO 639

When will any part of ISO 639 list Ulster Scots? I couldn't find it today in any part. There was certainly a UKMARC code for Ulster Scots, I recall, but I can't find my UKMARC files at the moment.

Also I mislaid my files of British Library statistics (due to changing computers a couple of years ago) which listed British Library holdings by language code, so I don't have the possibility at the moment to identify the previously used UKMARC code, or the statistics.

Though a new alpha-3 code would be needed now, not the old one.

However, In Ulster Scots, there are now many documents - especially official ones, as indicated below - as well as many web documents in (and not just about) Ulster Scots (also known as Ullans) so it definitely fits the criteria for being used in ISO 639-2.

Given its official status, I propose that it is also suitable for inclusion in ISO 639-1 as well.


I'm tied up full time in other projects next week, and don't have time to take the following forward, other than providing this initial information below, but might one one of the JAC members be in a position to take up progressing an entry for Ulster Scots in all three parts of ISO 639?

There is a convincing history of use.

There is a longstanding email list (ULLANS-L) and website for Ulster Scots, and now several more.


Ulster Scots is defined in legislation (The North/South Co-operation (Implementation Bodies) Northern Ireland Order 1999) as

the variety of the Scots language which has traditionally been used in parts of Northern Ireland and in Donegal in Ireland [1] (http://www.coe.int/T/E/Legal_Affairs/Local_and_regional_Democracy/Regional_or_Minority_languages/Documentation/1_Periodical_reports/2002_5e_MIN-LANG_PR_UK.asp).
Furthermore The United Kingdom declares, in accordance with Article 2, paragraph 1 of the Charter that it recognises that Scots and Ulster Scots meet the Charter's definition of a regional or minority language for the purposes of Part II of the Charter [2] (http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/ListeDeclarations.asp?NT=148&CV=1&NA=&PO=999&CN=999&VL=1&CM=9&CL=ENG).


Relevant links include:

The Ulster-Scots Agency (Tha Boord o Ulstèr-Scotch)
(http://www.ulsterscotsagency.com)
(Language, Identity and Politics in Northern Ireland)
(http://www.bbc.co.uk/northernireland/learning/history/stateapart/agreement/culture/support/cul2_c011.shtml)
Ulster-Scots voices (BBC site)
(http://www.bbc.co.uk/northernireland/learning/voices/ulsterscots/index.shtml)
Pronunciation of Ulster Scots
(http://www.scots-online.org/grammar/uscots.htm)
Scots Online (http://www.scots-online.org/)

The above information was retrieved from <http://www.irelandinformationguide.com/Ulster_Scots_language>



John Clews

--

**************************************************************************
 
Experience the British Library online at www.bl.uk
 
Help the British Library conserve the world's knowledge. Adopt a Book. www.bl.uk/adoptabook
 
**************************************************************************
 
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this e-mail and notify the [log in to unmask] : The contents of this e-mail must not be disclosed or copied without the sender's consent. 
 
The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the British Library. The British Library does not take any responsibility for the views of the author. 
 
**************************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

April 2021
January 2021
November 2020
June 2020
May 2019
February 2019
September 2018
April 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
May 2016
April 2016
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
May 2013
April 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager