On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 15:09 +0000, Rob Sanderson wrote:
> 16 (ish) megabyte SRW/U requests? What are they doing that needs such a
> huge request object?
Sorry, 16 (ish) kb, not mb... I blame the obvious distraction ...
> But yes, along with the documentation revision, we should do this.
> On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 14:50 +0100, Mike Taylor wrote:
> > Here is another use-case where someone needs SRU/POST.
> > We encountered the following problem(s):
> > We have an SRU/SRW service build, based on the Generic File Server.
> > One of our applications tries to send very large (>16.000 bytes) GET
> > requests to the service.
> > This fails with an HTTP 500 message.