LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ZNG Archives


ZNG Archives

ZNG Archives


ZNG@C4VLPLISTSERV01.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ZNG Home

ZNG Home

ZNG  July 2005

ZNG July 2005

Subject:

Re: srw/u next steps

From:

Eric Lease Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative

Date:

Fri, 1 Jul 2005 09:55:51 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (62 lines)

I still ask myself, "What will we have done in six, twelve, and
eighteen months from now in order to make more people aware of the
benefits of standardized search as we have defined it?"

Unceremoniously, I suggest the following things, listed in no priority
order:

   * Apply for one or more grants - The purpose of these grants is not
so much to develop/enhance the protocol, but rather to explore methods
for exploiting the protocol (i.e. additional SRW/U gateways to other
search engines, SRW/U interfaces to other collections of content, SRW/U
libraries written in [insert your favorite language here], the
development of generic SRW/U clients that transform search results into
different flavors of output, the creation of a union catalog/index,
etc.).

   * Build relationships with other interested groups - Are any of our
employers members of the DLF, ARL, CNI, SPARC, Vendor Initiative for
Enabling Web Services (VIEWS), etc? If so, then these groups represent
communities to whom we can build relationships and share our message.

   * Distribute a Powerpoint presentation - This interactive file would
literally define, outline, and illustrate the benefits of SRW/U.
"Interactive" and "illustrates" are the key words. This file would be
not only informative but entertaining as well.

   * Facilitate a number of workshops - These hands-on tutorials (in
venues like DLF Forums, JCDL, ECDL, ALA/LITA, etc.) would provide ways
for decision-makers as well as implementors to ask experts about the
in's and out's of SRW/U as well as see first-hand how it works.

   * Implement a conformance tester - The implementation of a
conformance tester will make developer's work easier and build
confidence. It will provide the means for an implementor who is
developing something in [insert your language here] to move ahead more
quickly. Think of it as a means for providing an SRW/U Seal of
Approval.

   * Tighten up the documentation - We all know the advantages and
disadvantages of SRW and SRU. I suggest the protocol(s) get frozen for
a specific period of time, re-write the documentation according to the
frozen specification, and supplement the documentation with
non-normative guidelines.

   * Write a number of articles - In academia articles are the most
accepted form of promotion. What's more, the written word is literally
a form of communication transcending space and time. You can write an
article and subsequently share your ideas to people across the globe a
year later. Very powerful. The library community abounds with venues to
write articles about SRW/U. There are other communities as well. We
could enumerate publications, divvy them up, and submit articles
accordingly.

Do y'all have any additional ideas? Do I see any hands out there
volunteering to participate and/or lead some of these efforts?

--
Eric Lease Morgan
University Libraries of Notre Dame

(574) 631-8604

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

July 2017
October 2016
July 2016
August 2014
February 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
February 2013
January 2013
October 2012
August 2012
April 2012
January 2012
October 2011
May 2011
April 2011
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager