LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  August 2005

ARSCLIST August 2005

Subject:

Re: "Archival" DVD-R?

From:

Jerome Hartke <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 7 Aug 2005 20:20:14 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (56 lines)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mike Richter
> Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2005 11:15 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] "Archival" DVD-R?
>
> Joav Shdema wrote:
> > Steve and all,
> > I have been using Verbatim and Mitsui (and Quantegy) for a better part
> > of the past 3 years. In this period prices went down and speed went up
> > considerably. From 3-4 manufacturers we now have numerous. Although I
> > have not witnessed an aged corrupt DVD yet data start to amass.
> > Recording layer corruption, layers separating, cracks, storage scratches
> > and other. I recon (and naively hope) that staying with the best brand
> > names would be safer until data could be verified in 10-20 years.
> > Our Master cabinets are at room temperature, locked and dark. Air-con is
> > on during the hotter hours of the day to keep an average 23!C. Hardly
> > archiving, more of a real world condition. In these conditions we have
> > never had any problems with DVD-R or CDRs of any brand from real
> > el-cheapos to the best of the best. Others miles may vary... If the copy
> > you supply is the only copy why not supply 2 copies and get done with
> > it? :-) Mark one as MASTER and seal it, mark the other WORK COPY and
> > leave it open. I always keep my own copy as safety back-up.
>
> Again, speaking out of turn:
>
> Multiple copies are an excellent choice, indeed, I would say a necessary
> one.
>
> They should be on different media, both (or all) of high quality.
>
> I trust that by "seal", you do not mean hermetically seal the disc.
> Keeping air out means trapping gasses in, which I believe is considered
> unwise for recordable optical media. Of course, you are correct that a
> master copy should not be accessed except to verify integrity.
>
> Whatever media you use, please calibrate them on your hardware - that
> is, determine the optimum record speed by minimum error count - then
> record at or near that speed. My experience is that premature failure of
> quality discs is consistently associated with either poor handling or a
> poor initial recording. Both may be avoided without great effort.
>
> Mike
> --
> [log in to unmask]
> http://www.mrichter.com/

As usual, Mike is quite correct. I might add incorrect volume and file
structure logical errors as a third, common source of premature failure.
Such discs "work" in some operating systems, but fail is others or later
versions of a "good" O/S.

Jerry
Media Sciences, Inc.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Error during command authentication.

Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=111). The server is probably not started.

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager