> From: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of John
> There _may_ even be a case for its inclusion in ISO 639-1, but
> on the current numbers of speakers is vital before deciding that
> in ISO 639-1 would be a good thing.
The request was for 639-2 only. Is there a reason for us to consider
639-1 as well?