>> From: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
> Behalf Of John
>> There _may_ even be a case for its inclusion in ISO 639-1, but
>> on the current numbers of speakers is vital before deciding that
>> in ISO 639-1 would be a good thing.
> The request was for 639-2 only. Is there a reason for us to consider
> 639-1 as well?
No. As you say, if it wasn't asked for, don't lets offer it.