On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 12:46 +0100, Matthew J. Dovey wrote:
> > I would propose for the request to have space or plus sign separated
> > recordSchema's. For a generic wrapper there are lots of
> > possibilities. I
> > give some suggestions but there may be better ones. I also like Bill's
> > RDF suggestion, but only if the server is allowed to choose
> > between RDF
> > and a generic wrapper.
> Firstly, I don't think we need to change anything in the response - we
> already have wrapper schemas such as METS and MPEG21 DIDL which do the
> job already.
> In the request, I was thinking of having as XML structure such as:
And in SRU, where you can't have structure in the request?
Guess it's lucky we didn't deprecate SRW ;)