>> Simple solution:
>> <recordSchema>mets dc rec</recordSchema>
>Despite the fun I've been having arguing philosophy, I still agree
>with Matthew that the solution to this particular problem is: "What
And I agree, to a certain extent.
However, if someone wants to implement something to get back records
wrapped together, then there should be a recommendation as to how to do
it. I don't like the recommendation of 'Create a million new schema
identifiers, one for each possible combination of schemas' when the
issue is relatively easy to solve, as above.
If there's an implementation, I don't think it's a big enough issue to
warrant quibbling about as far as a change in semantics for the next
version goes. For there to be an implementation, we need to decide on
an appropriate recommendation.