Robert Sanderson wrote:
> When we first did the rec context set, Adam and Theo both asked
> separately if it could be turned into a schema. So I did :)
It's actually pretty close to correct, except that I'm not quite sure
why "modified" occurs twice - perhaps it should be "modified" and
"modifiedBy" instead - like this:
<xsi:element name="modifiedBy" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
<xsi:element name="modified" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
I note also that there is a newer version
info:srw/cql-context-set/2/rec-1.1), but it's not referenced by the LC
SRW record schemas page at
http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/zing/srw/record-schemas.html. Should it?
-- Archie Warnock [log in to unmask]
-- A/WWW Enterprises www.awcubed.com
-- As a matter of fact, I _do_ speak for my employer.