> > Like a METS wrapper around record + metadata? :)
> > http://www.loc.gov/mets/
> I'm not familiar with METS, but, yes, this sounds right.
Which is good, as it was almost exactly what you said last year when we
suggested using METS as a wrapper around record and metadata (albeit in
the context of the update service, which is where rec schema may also be
used): "From my position of near-total ignorace, this sounds like a good